CIT Bank vs. Openbank
Comparing CIT Bank and Openbank for high-yield savings: CIT Bank's Platinum Savings pays 3.75% APY while Openbank's High-Yield Savings Account pays 4.09% APY.
See how they compare on rate stability, mobile app ratings, and more below.
The Bottom Line
Who pays more interest on $10,000? Openbank pays $34 more than CIT Bank annually ($409 vs $375).
Choose CIT Bank if mobile app quality matters, or you want Zelle for quick transfers. Choose Openbank if getting the best rate matters most.
| Metric | CIT BankPlatinum Savings Feb 21, 2026 | OpenbankHigh-Yield Savings Account Feb 21, 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| APY | 0.25% - 3.75% | 4.09% |
Est. Earnings | $5,000+$188 $10,000+$375 $25,000+$938 | $5,000+$205 $10,000+$409 $25,000+$1,023 |
Min Deposit | $100 | $500 |
Snapshot view. Rates subject to change. | ||
Terms | This is a tiered savings account, where the 3.75% APY requires meeting the $5,000 balance requirement. Lower balances earn an APY of 0.25%. | - |
| Features | FDIC InsuredMod. MinimumGreat iOS AppGreat Android AppZelle® SupportedDaily CompoundingRate Changes Often | FDIC InsuredLow MinimumsRate Changes Often |
Prefer In-Person Banking?
Both of these banks are online-only. If you need physical branch access, check out our list of high-yield accounts with brick-and-mortar locations.
Executive Summary
Openbank offers a High-Yield Savings Account with a competitive APY of 4.09%, making it the top choice between the two banks. This account requires a minimum deposit of $500 and has no maintenance fees, while also providing monthly compounding. In comparison, CIT Bank's highest yielding product is the Platinum Savings account, which offers an APY of 3.75%, but requires a minimum balance of $5,000 to earn that rate; lower balances earn only 0.25%. Both banks operate online-only and do not require direct deposit for their savings accounts.
The analysis is based on current Banksparency database records
* This content is provided for informational purposes only; always verify details with the provider.
Why CIT Bank?
- ✓Higher rated iOS app (4.8 vs 3.1)
- ✓Higher rated Android app (4.7 vs 2.6)
- ✓Offers 2 different high-yield savings options
- ✓Fast transfers via Zelle®
Why Openbank?
- ✓Higher potential APY (4.09% vs 3.65%-3.75%) on all balances
— Key Feature Differences —
Better Returns at $10,000
OpenbankOpenbank's High-Yield Savings Account earns more on smaller deposits (approx. $409 vs $375/yr).
Better Returns at $25,000
OpenbankOpenbank's High-Yield Savings Account pulls ahead with larger amounts (approx. $1023 vs $938/yr).
Best for Simplicity
OpenbankOpenbank's High-Yield Savings Account offers 4.09% APY with no bundling, direct deposit requirement or caps.
Best Mobile App Experience
CIT BankCIT Bank offers an iOS app rated 4.8 (vs. 3.1) and Android app rated 4.7 (vs. 2.6)
Shared Benefits
Over a 1-year period, Openbank's High-Yield Savings Account pays $34 more interest on a $10,000 balance than CIT Bank's Platinum Savings.
*This calculation assumes current rates remain consistent for 1 year and does not include temporary bonuses.
* Secure link to our partner
Non-sponsored link to official site
Top Market Contenders
CIT Bank vs. Openbank Savings Calculator
You earn $34 more with Openbank than CIT Bank on a $10,000 initial deposit for 1 year*.
*This calculation assumes that APYs remain unchanged for 1 year, and takes into account known promo rate periods, but does not factor in bonuses. You can see how often these banks have changed their rates in the Compare Savings Rates Over Time section below.
CIT Bank
Platinum Savings
Savings Breakdown
- Interest Earned+$375.00(3.6%)
- Total Contributions$0
- Initial Deposit$10,000
Projected Balance
$10,375.00
Openbank
High-Yield Savings Account
Savings Breakdown
- Interest Earned+$409.00(3.9%)
- Total Contributions$0
- Initial Deposit$10,000
Projected Balance
$10,409.00
The Banksparency Savings Calculator provides estimated savings growth based on user input and our latest data.
Still banking with Chase, Bank of America, or Wells Fargo?
On a $10,000 balance, you're missing out on at least $374 per year in interest.
Both CIT Bank and Openbank dramatically outperform the typical 0.01% APY at traditional big banks.
| Feature | CIT Bank | Openbank |
|---|---|---|
| APY | 3.75% Range: 0.25% - 3.75% Verified: 2/21/2026 Stable (90d) | 4.09% Verified: 2/21/2026 ↘︎ 0.11%90d Change |
| Product Name | Platinum Savings | High-Yield Savings Account |
| Minimum Deposit | $100 | $500 |
| Min. Balance for APY | $5,000 | $0 |
| Monthly Fee | $0 | $0 |
| Compound Frequency | Daily | Monthly |
| Branch Access | None | None |
| Account Type | Online Only | Online Only |
| Physical Branches | None. You cannot make use of First Citizens Bank's branches. | None |
| Direct Deposit Req. | None | None |
| Checking Bundle | No | No |
| Mobile Apps | ||
| FDIC Insured | YesVerify FDIC | YesVerify FDIC |
| Zelle® Support | Available Supported for eChecking users post-First Citizens merger. | Not Supported |
| BBB Rating | A+ | A- |
| Important Notes | This is a tiered savings account, where the 3.75% APY requires meeting the $5,000 balance requirement. Lower balances earn an APY of 0.25%. | - |
| Next Steps | Visit SiteGo to CIT Bank * Secure link to our partner | Visit SiteVerify at Openbank Non-sponsored link to official site |
📈 Compare Savings Rates Over Time
Historical Performance
| Metric | CIT Bank | Openbank | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Savings Connect | Platinum Savings | High-Yield Savings Account | |
Current APY | 3.65% | 3.75% | 4.09% |
Trend | Stable | Stable | Stable |
Velocity (bps/mo) | -3.8 | -4.4 | -2.7 |
Days Since Change | 93 | 93 | 16 |
12-Month High | 4.00% | 4.30% | 4.75% |
12-Month Low | 3.65% | 3.75% | 4.09% |
Adjustments / Mo | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.33 |
Volatility Score | 0.037 | 0.041 | 0.027 |
How to read these metrics(Click to expand)
Compare Similar High-Yield Accounts
Compare CIT Bank vs...
Comparing against Standard Savings
Compare Openbank vs...
Comparing against Standard Savings
High Rates (With Checking Bundle)
Looking for something different? Check out these top-rated alternatives.